Japan: After Court Upholds Faggot Marriage Ban, Activists Say International Businesses Want Anal

If there is an actual “democracy” on earth in the classic sense, it is Japan.

Japan is a gross country, but that is because nipponese people are all pedophiles. It is rule by the people, and they don’t want immigrants or gays (except their young boys who they use for their purposes).

Japan is also not a healthy country – they’re not marrying and having kids. So democracy doesn’t really work to build a good place to live. “Rule by the people” is stupid, and it should be “rule by the aristocracy with the consent of the people” (the consent part means it’s not oppression). The idea that the masses of the country – of any country – are fit to make decisions about how a country is run is retarded on its face, but at the same time, they will be able to make the very most basic, common sense decisions, like “no, we don’t want to be flooded with foreigners” or “no, we don’t want state-enforced women’s equality” or “no, we don’t want faggots taking over everything.”

Regardless of the view on democracy, in terms of actually, autistically implementing “rule by the people” – Japan does that. Every white country, conversely, is always just Jewing over the basic spirit of their own laws to force rule by an elite financial minority.

Reuters:

A Japanese court ruled on Monday that a ban on same-sex marriage was not unconstitutional, dealing a setback to LGBTQ rights activists in the only Group of Seven nation that does not allow people of the same gender to marry.

The ruling dashes activists’ hopes of raising pressure on the central government to address the issue after a court in the city of Sapporo in March 2021 decided in favour of a claim that not allowing same-sex marriage was unconstitutional.

Three same-sex couples – two male, one female – had filed the case in a district court in Osaka, only the second to be heard on the issue in Japan.

In addition to rejecting their claim that being unable to marry was unconstitutional, the court threw out their demand for 1 million yen ($7,400) in damages for each couple.

I actually wonder if the legal system in this country is really working,” said plaintiff Machi Sakata, who married her U.S.-citizen partner in the United States. The two are expecting a baby in August.

There it is. The system is broken because it serves popular opinion.

For decades on end, the West has been telling people that democracy is the opposite of what it says it is – it is not actually about popular opinion, but minority dominance. Gays and women are trying to bring this to Japan.

“I think there’s the possibility this ruling may really corner us,” Sakata said.

Japan’s constitution defines marriage as being based on “the mutual consent of both sexes”. But the introduction of partnership rights for same-sex couples in Tokyo last week, along with rising support in opinion polls, had raised the hopes of activists and lawyers for the Osaka case.

The Osaka court said that marriage was defined as being only between opposite genders and not enough debate on same-sex marriage had taken place in Japanese society.

Legalising same-sex marriage would have far-reaching implications both socially and economically, activists say, and would help attract foreign firms to the world’s third-biggest economy.

“International firms are reviewing their Asian strategy and LGBTQ inclusivity is becoming a topic,” said Masa Yanagisawa, head of prime services at Goldman Sachs and a board member of the activist group Marriage for all Japan, speaking before the verdict.

International businesses don’t want to invest in a location that isn’t LGBTQ-friendly.”

Yeah, that’s probably the best argument that would work on the masses of Japanese people – “this anti-gay thing is messing with your money.” You could eventually convince the nips to go along with it using that argument – probably.

The only people who are going to hold a hard line on “morals before money” are highly religious societies – Buddhist, Moslem, or the remaining Christian societies (really only Poland and some Latino and African states left). Japan is not a religious society. So morality based on “I don’t like that shit” is going to be very difficult to uphold in the face of “it’s hitting the bottom line.”

Of course, it would still probably take decades to get the Japs to go along with this, unless the West started directly sanctioning their exports, in which case they would just say “okay, whatever – let’s go anal.”