Lying Jew Media Claims Retailers Lying About Impact of Roving Bands of Negro Youth

Andrew Anglin September 26, 2023

Most people are aware that the Jewish media is dishonest, and pushes an agenda. In fact, even leftists say this, despite the fact that the media narrative is in line with at least 90% of mainstream leftist views.

The process of communicating false ideas is not typically understood, however. If the media says a hurricane is coming, or they say there was a shooting and 3 people died, that is generally going to be true. So most of the dishonesty comes from spin, and lies by omission. “Spin” is a whole huge issue that is beyond the scope of what I want to say right now (though I should write something comprehensive about it at some point). “Lies by omission” are very obvious as a concept. For example, they will report that a Palestinian stabbed an Israeli, but not report that it was in response to an unprovoked attack by the Israeli police on one of Islam’s holiest sites.

The case of Trayvon Martin’s death is a case of a lot of spin, and various lies of omission. NBC edited George Zimmerman’s 911 call to remove the part where he was asked about the race of Martin, to make it seem like he had simply offered that information without being asked. We know they purposefully used a very old picture of Trayvon, while recent pictures (that they had in their possession) showed him looking like a thug (AKA a “typical nigger of the sort all Americans are well aware of”). They didn’t mention that Skittles and Arizona Ice Tea are used as ingredients for “lean” (also called “sizzurp,” a recreational opioid drink), and instead framed it as though he was a small boy buying candy. Then when the details of the attack came out, including pictures showing that Zimmerman had clearly been attacked, they basically just didn’t report it.

If you went through the whole Trayvon Martin story, you’d have a hard time pinning the media down on an actual, direct false statement. That is, you would have a hard time pinning AP, Reuters, NYT, etc. down on that – you could certainly find directly false statements from MSNBC hosts (and the commentary media’s overlap with the “straight news” media is another aspect of all of this that is very important).

For some reason I just used the example of Trayvon Martin, but you could do the same with George Floyd or any of these other “good boy who didn’t do nothing” cases. The media is able to communicate totally false concepts to people without ever printing a “classic lie.”

There is, however, one trick that the media has to allow them to simply make things up out of thin air, and that is the “anonymous sources” trope (which, arguably, is also a canard).

With “anonymous sources,” the media is able to say literally anything. There is no way to prove whether these sources exist at all. This technique was used widely to start the Iraq War, in particular by a Jew New York Times journalist named Judith Miller. She was working directly with the Pentagon to drum up the idea that Saddam was planning to nuke America, and the structure of the hoax was based on the “anonymous sources” scam.

I read a book about this whole thing years ago, but I can’t remember the name or author. It seems like it was someone associated with Max Blumenthal but it might have been a libertarian. I don’t remember. Anyway, the Wiki page on Miller is not bad for a general outline. It’s really one of the most important media hoaxes in history, given that it was so straightforward and the whole thing is so well documented.

Miller was never prosecuted, despite the fact that she and her Pentagon associates bear personal responsibility for the deaths of thousands of Americans and over a million Iraqis. At the very least, this was fraud and a criminal conspiracy.

Despite the fact that the Miller-Times Iraq hoax should have effectively ended the practice of anonymous sources being the basis for news stories, this has continued and gotten much worse. Most of the fake news used to attack Donald Trump was based on anonymous sources (including the “Russian bounties on American soldiers” hoax by the Washington Post, which was virtually identical to the Miller Affair in that it was done in cooperation with the Pentagon and used to drum up a war as well as to attack Trump during the election season).

Today, we have a kind of textbook example of this sort of hoaxery in the case of an NBC report claiming that “anonymous sources” say that the roving bands of negro youth looting retailers are not really responsible for the problems of retailers. In fact, anonymous sources say, it is the fault of the companies themselves that they are losing money, because they have totally unrelated problems that just by sheer coincidence coincide with crippling retail theft.

CNBC:

Retailers who blame organized theft for lower profits could be overstating crime’s impact to cover up internal flaws or self-inflicted problems, CNBC has learned.

During recent earnings calls, major companies have blamed disappointing bottom lines or shrinking margins in part on roving bands of organized gangs that ransack their shelves. The issue could come up again as a string of major retailers start to report second-quarter results next week.

But behind closed doors, retailers are facing other issues they can better control, including theft by their own employees, that are contributing to losses, according to two sources who advise major retailers. They spoke on the condition of anonymity because they’re not authorized to speak publicly about clients.

Many retailers have invested in technology to better understand what leads to shrink, or the gap between the inventory a company has and what it sells. Some companies have since identified theft from employees as a major contributor to losses, even as they blame external theft in public, said one of the sources.

Losses from self-checkout theft have also become a major issue, the people said.

This is an astonishing place to use anonymous sources. You would expect that there is someone, somewhere that would go on record making these claims. But apparently not.

In this case, it certainly appears that there are no sources. It appears that NBC wanted to report that the blacks are not actually responsible for the problems of these companies, and they decided to invent sources.

This story will now be cited nonstop by liberal pundits, who will claim that “racists” who believe that mass looting of stores is a problem are lying, and really, it isn’t a problem at all – “based on reports.”

If there was an honest media landscape, you would have certain publications vowing to never use anonymous sources for the core of a story. It is of course something different if people who provide extra information wish to remain anonymous. Sometimes people who witness events of public violence want to remain anonymous. And sometimes whistleblowers remain anonymous, but they provide documentation to the media.

This practice of running entire stories based completely on anonymous sources has become ridiculous and I would say criminal. This is a type of large scale fraud being committed by a media that colludes together to falsify reality.

There is no possible way that this mass looting we are seeing from the blacks is not affecting the bottom line of companies significantly. This is an obvious reality, to the point where we also have to consider that there are people who want to believe blacks are innocent of any wrongdoing, even when they are committing crimes, because there is apparently an audience for this type of yellow journalism.

© Copyright Daily Stormer 2023, All Rights Reserved -- Join the Daily Stormer site chat for future updates in case of further domain seizure.