Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Don’t kid yourself – nothing is going to happen.
The only path out of mass censorship is Elon Musk buying Twitter.
But it’s still funny to see Fauci getting dragged up.
RT:
The White House’s chief medical advisor, Anthony Fauci, and other senior officials are set to be deposed under oath as part of a lawsuit claiming the government worked alongside social media platforms to create a “massive censorship enterprise” throughout the Covid-19 outbreak.
In a Friday ruling, Judge Terry Doughty granted a joint request from the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana to compel several current and former officials to testify in the suit, among them Fauci, ex-White House press secretary Jen Psaki, Director of White House Digital Strategy Rob Flaherty, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and two high-level figures from the FBI and Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
“After finding documentation of a collusive relationship between the [Joe] Biden administration and social media companies to censor free speech, we immediately filed a motion to get these officials under oath,” Missouri AG Eric Schmitt said in a statement. “It is high time we shine a light on this censorship enterprise and force these officials to come clean to the American people, and this ruling will allow us to do just that. We’ll keep pressing for the truth.”
While the defense insisted that senior officials can only be called to testify about their actions in office under “extraordinary circumstances,” Judge Doughty said the personnel in question met that standard. He added that the two Republican-led states “have proven that Dr. Fauci has personal knowledge about the issue concerning censorship across social media as it related to Covid-19,” ordering him to cooperate with a deposition.
Fauci actually had personal reasons to want censorship, given that he was involved in the crooked funding of crooked experiments, and personally getting seriously paid.
Requests to depose the other officials were granted on similar grounds, as the judge concluded all either held direct meetings with social media firms about the purported censorship, or had close knowledge of those discussions.
Jen Easterly, who heads up the DHS’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) was also ordered to testify. She played a “central role” in “flagging misinformation to social-media companies for censorship,” the plaintiffs argued, describing the cyber agency the “nerve center” of “the federal government’s efforts to censor social media users.”
The same official was said to be involved in the DHS’ now-defunct ‘Disinformation Governance Board’ – dubbed the ‘Ministry of Truth’ by critics – which would have created a new mechanism to facilitate cooperation between the White House and social media sites.
Initially filed last May by Schmitt and Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry, the lawsuit claims the federal government encouraged online platforms to censor, delete or ban certain speech about the pandemic, including discussion of the “lab leak theory of Covid-19’s origin,” as well as questions about the effectiveness of face masks, vaccines or lockdown policies, among other issues.
The censorship did become illegal, exiting the dumb ideological world of “a private company can do anything it wants to anyone,” when the government started telling social media companies to censor and what to censor. They’re not allowed to do that.
This was ultimately not about the “lab leak theory,” which is itself a hoax to cover up the truth. The truth is, there wasn’t ever any “novel coronavirus.” All these people did was rename the flu. It’s exhausting to have to keep saying this, but no one can point to any single thing that would have been different if there was no new virus. The death toll would have been the same, the symptoms would have been the same, everything would have been the same.
You look at this global warming hoax, and they’re pointing to things that have always happened and saying “see – global warming!” I just saw a PBS special about people migrating out of Africa, and they said – as a matter of fact – that it was because of global warming. They did not mention Africa’s population change over the last few decades.
They just said “there is a drought and there’s never been a drought ever in all of history, so it is caused by cow farts.”
So it is very possible and very easy for the government and the media to point to something that was already happening and say that it’s something new which needs this big solution.
And you saw the way they rolled out this whole agenda. If you think they just came up with all of that on the fly, then I’m sorry, but you’re just dumb.
This isn’t confusing. It doesn’t take a high level mind.
This is the question: what would have been different if there was no new virus?
This is the answer: nothing.
No one has an answer other than “nothing.” Everyone agrees that nothing would have been different. But then they will say “yeah but there was a virus though.”
People just can’t get their heads around the idea that the government/media would lie this much. They will just admit that they have no evidence – not even any circumstantial evidence – and then say “yeah but they wouldn’t lie that much.”
It’s goofy and it’s pathetic.
No respect.
The whole world changed because of the coronavirus hoax, and there was no pandemic. There was no increase in deaths (until they rolled out the safe and effective vaccine which started killing untold numbers). The whole thing was a lie, and talking about “lab leak” just gets the stupid conservative goyim to continue believing the narrative.
