Mexican White Supremacy Shooting Theory Promoted with a Straight Face

When the most recent shooting happened in Texas, I highlighted that a “ctrl+f” search of the AP article on it didn’t bring up the term “white,” which meant the shooter was not white, because if a shooter is white, they immediately announce that in every case.

That was again true in this case – the shooter was not white.

However, the ctrl+f search now brings up results for “white,” given that we are apparently dealing with a non-white white supremacist.

The Jewish media is increasingly taking a “peek-a-boo” type approach to reporting the news, given that most Americans are stupid babies.

“Non-white white supremacist” might seem too dumb even for a stupid little baby who gets fooled by peek-a-boo (or the “got your nose” trick), but this is what they’re going with.

Also: incel, neo-Nazi, and Russia-linked.

Presumably other buzzwords will be added, until the story is dropped completely after the shooter is linked to an FBI influence operation.

Heavy:

Mauricio Garcia was the 33-year-old shooter who killed eight people May 6 at Allen Premium Outlets Mall in Allen, Texas, leaving behind a trail of racist and anti-Semitic writings. The Texas Department of Public Safety identified Garcia on May 7 after NBC News and CNN first identified him.

Garcia, dressed in tactical gear, opened fire around 3:30 p.m. on May 6, 2023, Allen Police Chief Brian E. Harvey said in a news conference. Another seven people were injured, Allen Fire Chief Jonathan Boyd said in the same news conference. A police officer shot and killed Garcia at the scene, Harvey said.

I don’t want to sound like a conspiracy theorist, but this whole “full body armor” thing has been very popular in these mass shootings since I think the Batman shooter in 2012, and it is very convenient.

In theory, someone working for the government can do the shooting in the body armor, and then disappear, and a corpse of some random retard from the internet could be dropped off at the scene.

I’m not saying that happened. But if you think the government wouldn’t murder some guy from the internet, then send a CIA agent in to shoot random people, then place the body of the rando at the scene, then you’re delusional.

The government is literally trying to manipulate as many small children as possible into permanently mutilating their bodies through the so-called “child tranny industrial complex” system. Again, doing this to a child is the worst thing you could ever do, and it is definitely much worse than shooting random people at a mall. Anyone who would do the former would do the latter.

In social media posts reviewed by Heavy on the platform OK.RU, Garcia posted references to Adolf Hitler, called himself an “incel,” and said he had moved toward right-wing ideology. “I hate women. Their I’ve said it,” he wrote in one spelling-error riddled post. He also wrote about mass shootings and, on the day before the mall massacre, he posted, “Moons full loser’s. See you in the morning.” OK.RU, or Odnoklassniki, is a popular Russian social media platform. Garcia’s page is filled with angry rants about society and various groups of people.

He shared a photo of tactical gear in April.

Oh, hmm. Very interesting. The FBI is monitoring everyone who says right-wing stuff on the internet.

Except, apparently, this guy, who, along with posting right-wing material, was also saying he was going to kill people.

He also posted a screenshot of the busiest times at the mall, meaning if the FBI had been monitoring him (as they are monitoring every other right-winger on the internet), they would have known he had a planned target.

It’s a really convenient screw-up by the FBI, given that they are obsessed with promoting the idea that right-wing terrorist attacks are going to happen all the time.

It’s quite fantastic the way that virtually every instance of government incompetence benefits the government.

What are the odds?

In one post, he wrote, “If illegal aliens, Antifa, and BlackLivesMatter are allowed to break the law with impunity, why should other Americans respect the law? Why not break the law if you can get away with it as others are allowed to do.” He also shared posts from the Daily Stormer, a neo-Nazi, white supremacist website. Some posts were anti-Semitic; he wrote, “America is controlled by a cabal of scheming Jews, and the time has come to rise up against them.” He also wrote, “We are going to make America white again.” He was fascinated with Jeffrey Dahmer and mentioned Parkland, Florida, school shooter Nikolas Cruz.

…

According to The New York Times, which first reported on the social media platform’s existence, Garcia suggested several times that he was “of Hispanic origin — at one point indicating they are originally from Mexico,” but expressed white supremacy ideology. He also photographed and posted many pages of journal entries and drawings on the social media account. Garcia also shared photos of bullets, knives, guns, and shooting range targets. He wrote “my kind of people” with a picture of a man in a Nazi uniform.

Yeah.

Okay.

Well.

Let me just do my various mass shooter narratives, in bullet point form:

• Most of these shootings are often done by the government in some direct way, i.e., FBI agents find a vulnerable guy on the internet and talk him into doing the shooting (you can check out the whole “Gretchen Whitmer Kidnapping Hoax” for more on the way federal law enforcement sets up stupid or otherwise vulnerable people and gets them to commit crimes that are beneficial to the federal government).
• Other mass shootings involve a situation where the FBI is aware that someone is probably going to do a mass shooting and they refuse to do anything to prevent it (this is what many people believe happened with the Parkland High School shooting – the FBI had been repeatedly warned that Nikolas Cruz was planning a mass shooting and did nothing).
• Insofar as a mass shooting is real, it is not political in any way, but simply anti-social. Shooting random people you don’t know is about the single most wacky act a person can ever do (at least this side of child trannies). It certainly doesn’t forward any type of political agenda, other than the political agenda of the US federal government (gun control, demonization of whites, justification for increased surveillance, pushing for more censorship, etc.). The person who is anti-social enough to kill random people for no reason is also going to be drawn to fringe material. Obviously, there was a recent tranny shooter, and I said the same thing then: this does not forward the tranny agenda; the person was anti-social and was drawn to trannyism because it is fringe and anti-social, just like this Mexican guy was drawn to fringe “neo-Nazi” material. The connection between doing a mass shooting and being interested in fringe political ideology is that these are both things an anti-social person does. The political ideology does not make you kill random people. This is just very obvious, and really too obvious to even have to explain.
• There are 350 million people in America, and it is a country with an extremely alienating and unhealthy culture. Shit is going to happen. Like with the drug addict issue, the issue of violence is social, and requires a social solution.
• Insofar as there is any political angle at all, censorship and silencing public discussion increase alienation and feelings of helplessness, and makes all forms of political violence more likely among people who are already mentally unstable.

I write this same stuff every time a mass shooting happens. I have done so for ten years.

The media spreads narratives that benefit the agenda of the ZOG globalist empire. They do that whenever anything happens, regardless of whether the government made it happen, let it happen, or if it happened on purpose.

Nothing logical is allowed to be injected into the narrative, which is why there is such heavy censorship and suppression of the public.

The Buffalo Shooter was a “white supremacist” that shot up a black supermarket. They published his “manifesto” and he talked about being groomed for the shooting by someone he called “The Sandman.” It was later revealed that there was a federal agent in his private Discord, who knew the shooting was going to happen and did nothing to try to stop it. It certainly appeared that “The Sandman” was the federal agent. Then the story disappeared.

So these types of conspiracies really are real.

For the most part, however, it probably makes more sense to focus on the fact that an American style mass shooting is not political. The only people who do mass shootings (or other forms of mass killing of random people) in a political way are the Moslems, and they do this while stating very matter-of-factly what their purpose is, i.e., “I’m killing random Americans in protest of America’s wars in the Middle East.”

The logic is: if enough of these terrorist attacks were happening, the public would demand an end to the wars in order to stop the attacks.

This does not translate into the right-wing shooter concept, because there is no demand being made, and the targets do not make any sense. It cannot be political. The only recent act of logical political shootings that I’m aware of was the attempted assassination of Congressman Steve Scalise and other congressmen at a baseball game in 2017. These are specific targets, and the shooter wanted Republicans to change their policies out of fear of being assassinated.

Just spend a minute trying to think of what political purpose a mass shooting at a mall could serve. There isn’t one.

This is why it was so frustrating to me when Republicans came out and copied the Democrat playbook with the tranny shooter, claiming that tranny ideology caused the shooting. I wrote about this in some length at the time, and noted that the only real angle was that it was a girl on huge amounts of testosterone, which would obviously increase the chances of a female doing something violent. But the Republican media chose to play the “oohhhhhh now your side has a mass shooter – that means your ideology creates violence!” angle, apparently incapable of grasping that they are reinforcing a dumb narrative that is always used against them.

This cartoon epitomizes the narrative:

You could easily change the image on the TV to Joe Biden talking about Republicans hating trannies – that was the Republican narrative on the tranny shooter.

They always do this “I know you are but what am I” thing, and all it does is make the discourse about everything stupider in a way that only benefits Democrats and the ZOG system.

After ten years, I am exhausted. None of the issues we talk about here are complicated. Everything is, to me, very straightforward and obvious, and as much as I rail against “stupid peasants,” the conclusions I put forward on this site are the conclusions that the majority of people would go to if the media did not exist.

There is no problem in the West that couldn’t be 98% solved if there were not people in power who benefit from the problems. That is the bottom line. What this means is that debate about the problems is completely pointless unless you start from the position of “there are people who want this to be happening.”

However, the problem is: that would be anti-Semitic.

Addendum

I want to add, yet again, that there is no such thing as “racism” or “white supremacy.” These are insults used against people who have legitimate grievances relating primarily to mass immigration, but also to black crime and the systematic disenfranchisement of white people in their own countries.

This is very important to remember and understand.

If the issues were talked about openly and freely, normal people would develop “right-wing” views, so instead people who disagree with the government are denounced as metaphysically evil, which means that their issues cannot be considered valid.

“Right-wing violence” is the perfect narrative to stop discussion, because the assertion is, if right-wingers are allowed to talk, it leads directly to the pointless killing of random people.

In relation to this latest event, I am being brought up in various articles about this shooting, as the media explains “non-white white supremacy.”

They have called me a “neo-Nazi” and a “white supremacist” for ten years.

They’ve never defined these terms. Instead, they’ve acted as though obvious jokes I made were intended as genuine statements of belief, despite the fact that no one would think that if it was seen in context.

What has happened to me, with continually being called a “neo-Nazi,” would be no different than if after publishing “A Modest Proposal,” Jonathan Swift was, for the rest of his life, referred to as “a man who believes Irish children should be butchered for food.”

Years ago, I had discussions with some of these journalists, and some of them were simply stupid, and clearly had zero familiarity with my work (i.e., they had not actually read the website at all), and believed that I was akin to a member of a skinhead prison gang. However, any of them that had read my work understood that these various outrageous quotes from me were intended as shock humor, and yet they felt comfortable falsely portraying my positions on issues because my actual positions are “bad enough.”

Point being: everything is about preventing the discussion by any means necessary, because if you have the discussion, and allow intelligent people to speak frankly, the truth is obvious to the majority of the population.