New York Times Reveals Elon’s Alleged Plan for Twitter

New York Times leaks are always very questionable, particularly when they relate to some issue that they are against.

However, regardless of the veracity of what the New York Times is saying, it is in the public interest to be aware of what they are saying.

Right now, there is no news on free speech – just claims he’s planning to make a lot of money. Maybe the NYT would be more honest about something like that, or maybe they would just make it up. Who knows.

RT:

Billionaire Elon Musk wants to quintuple Twitter’s revenue by 2028 and hire 3,600 employees after firing hundreds of them, the New York Times reported on Friday, citing a presentation to investors.

According to the report, Musk expects the number of employees to rise from around 7,500 to 9,225 this year, drop to 8,332 in 2023, and rise again to 11,072 by 2025.

The Tesla and SpaceX CEO was said to believe that Twitter’s total number of users will grow from 217 million at the end of last year to nearly 600 million by 2025 and 931 million by 2028. He also reportedly projected that Twitter’s revenue would quintuple to $26.4 billion by 2028.

The paper said the document shows that Musk sees advertising falling from around 90% of Twitter’s revenue in 2020 to 45% in the future. In 2028, ads would bring in $12 billion in revenue and subscriptions nearly $10 billion, the report said.

A group of 26 NGOs and advocacy organizations penned an open letter arguing that Musk’s takeover would “further toxify our information ecosystem” and be a threat to public safety. After Musk publicly called for the funding of these organizations to be investigated, the Daily Mail reported on Wednesday that billionaire George Soros and staffers of former US President Barack Obama and former state secretary Hillary Clinton are among the donors of the activists behind the letter.

I’m going to go out on a limb and suggest that when Elon asked who was funding the anti-free speech organizations, he actually already knew the answer was “George Soros.”

The fact that he knew Soros was funding these organizations and then asked about who is funding these organizations, knowing the answer would be “George Soros,” means that he is an anti-Semite.

You’re not allowed to talk about George Soros funding organizations against you – that is a direct attack on the entire Jewish people, as it forwards the false trope that Jews are trying to silence everyone as part of a censorship agenda.

As one reader of this website put it:

Jew Logic 101:

1. There is no censorship
2. There is nobody behind the censorship
3. Whoever is behind the censorship aren’t Jews
4. You are anti-semitic

Q.E.D.

Those are just the facts, and goyim are not allowed to press the issue.

In the interest of full disclosure, and at the risk of being called an anti-Semite and completely destroyed by the Jews, I must admit that I just got this tattoo: