Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Zeiger
Daily Stormer
August 4, 2016
“It is my esteemed opinion, that there is in fact no credible evidence to suggest a correlation between the appearance of clouds and rain.”
The great thing about being an expert is that you don’t really need to make sense, or even take evidence into account when making your arguments. You’re an expert, after all. Your very title speaks louder than silly things like “logic” or “facts.”
Here, right after the enormous election-rigging scandal that shook the DNC, “experts” are coming out in droves confidently saying that the general election couldn’t possibly be rigged.
wew, lads.
CBC:
Despite the ruminations of Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, experts say it’s highly improbable the outcome of the U.S. election will be rigged.
“You’d have to do a lot of shenanigans in lots of different states to tip things,” said Hans Noel, an associate professor of political science at Georgetown University. “Because running up the score in one state isn’t enough and that would make rigging an election really complicated and therefore unlikely.”
LOL!
That’s your argument, Mr. Expert? The rigging of this election, on which hinges trillions of dollars, a world war and the future of entire races of people, would be “really complicated” and thus it couldn’t happen?
Sending spaceships to Mars would be “really complicated,” so it’s unlikely to happen. Oh wait.
Trump made the “rigged” claims on Monday, first at a rally in Columbus, Ohio, and later in an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity. Trump told Hannity the election is “going to be rigged” and that Republicans need to be careful and watch closely, otherwise the election is “going to be taken away from us.”
…
While it’s certainly the case in American history that party machines have been able to influence elections in ways that would now be considered inappropriate, those days are largely gone, he said.
“Systematic voter fraud is actually really difficult to do and there’s no evidence of it happening,” he said.
Yeah, no. It happened just a few months ago, you retard. The supreme court of Austria had to order a redo of the whole election because the evidence of massive fraud was overwhelming.
Ooops, turns out an expert is catastrophically wrong again.
Trump didn’t mention the location of the suspect precincts of 2012, but to make any kind of impact, voting irregularities would have to occur in one of the battleground states. Any kind of voting manipulation in a handful of precincts in places like New York or California or Mississippi — states that reliably vote Republican or Democrat — would hardly turn the election, said Robert Shapiro, a political science professor at Columbia University.
“It just goes to show you this is the depth of [Trump’s] thought that goes into these things,” Shapiro said.
“The vote would have to be rigged in specific states, therefore it couldn’t happen.”
This guy could be Woody Allen’s long lost brother.
Wow, Jew, great analysis. Notice also that this point contradicts the argument of the previous retard. The first says it would have to be done in too many places, the second says it would have to be in a few critical places.
What a bunch of clowns.
The reality, of course, is that there is so much at stake here that it is basically impossible that there won’t at least be attempts at large scale voter fraud. Even of the Democratic establishment doesn’t organize anything themselves, their grassroots activists will do anything they can get away with to steal the election from Trump.
That’s why it’ll be key to get pro-Trump guys on the ground during the voting, in order to prevent the foul-play which is sure to be attempted.
We’re not going to let little things like vote-rigging get in the way of the God-Emperor’s ascension.
