Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Women are such stupid whores.
Instead of just saying “yeah, I did some porn – most women under the age of 40 have sex videos somewhere on the internet,” she is acting like these were private videos.
AP:
A candidate in a high-stakes legislative contest in Virginia had sex with her husband in live videos posted on a pornographic website and asked viewers to pay them money in return for carrying out specific sex acts.
Screenshots of Susanna Gibson on the website were shared with The Associated Press. The campaign for Gibson, a Democrat running for a seat in the Virginia House of Delegates in a district just outside Richmond, issued a statement Monday in which it denounced the sharing of the videos as a violation of the law and her privacy. Gibson called the exposure of the videos “the worst gutter politics.”
“It won’t intimidate me and it won’t silence me,” she said in the statement. “My political opponents and their Republican allies have proven they’re willing to commit a sex crime to attack me and my family because there’s no line they won’t cross to silence women when they speak up.”
The Washington Post first reported the videos on Monday.
The streams in question were on Chaturbate.
This is Susanna Gibson, who is running for a seat in the narrowly divided Virginia statehouse. As recently as last year she was posting as “HotWifeExperience” on the website Chaturbate, where men could pay tokens to get her to perform specific sex acts. pic.twitter.com/fjYmYbqK4o
— JR Majewski (@JRMajewski) September 12, 2023
It’s not “revenge porn.” She posted it herself. It’s just normal porn.
(“Revenge porn” is when a girl agrees to have sex on video under the understanding that it’s private and you post it on the internet without asking her. It’s illegal in a lot of places now, which is ridiculous in itself. But she’s trying to act like this is that, even though it obviously is not that.)
The only way she could claim it is illegal is by doing DMCA. lol.
It’s definitely not a “sex crime” to repost a clip from a porn video some bitch recorded.
Nonetheless, she literally hired a lawyer to go out there and say it is revenge porn, and libshit websites are repeating this like it’s real.
The thing about the Susanna Gibson story is that Virginia Republicans want to ban abortion so much they very likely committed a sex crime against herhttps://t.co/myziWmVUzH
— Susan Rinkunas (NEW ACCT) (@SusanRinkunas) September 12, 2023
For those who don’t understand (you all understand, but let’s just say in theory, you didn’t): there are sites that allow amateur girls to stream sex videos and get paid. Sometimes, women (or maybe sometimes men, but mostly women) will suggest that a married couple go on the site and do sex with each other for money. It’s not really about the money, I don’t think – it’s more like a lite version of joining a swingers’ club. It’s voyeurism.
I do agree with this stupid bitch that it’s really irrelevant to the political race. If you’re going to have women in politics, you’re going to have a lot of people in politics who have done porn. I don’t really see what the relevance of it is. A woman being in politics is a lot more offensive than a woman doing porn.
The reverse of this would make more sense – “porn star exposed for having run for Virginia state senate.”
Although this is supposedly an important race that is going to decide Virginia’s stance on the abortion issue, for many men, it is reminding them of a much bigger problem, and tearing at old wounds: the fact that no one ever found any sex videos of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez*.
*This is a joke, kids. Stay away from porn. I’m telling you right now: even if there was an AOC sex tape, I would not watch it. Of course, that’s easy to say because there isn’t one. My Brother in Christ, be thankful that no such temptation exists.
