data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50217/5021718cc67a801c64b30b743184ed0a0ceff587" alt=""
The fact checkers (more like fag checkers) at Snopes have admitted that they have ZERO evidence that the fires in Hawaii were not started by a directed energy weapon from space, saying that the assertion is “unfounded” as opposed to “false.”
Which seems more likely – that it’s all a big coincidence, or that it was a space weapon?
It’s a simple question: coincidence or conspiracy?
I had assumed it was a volcano. There is a volcano on Maui and we’ve been waiting for it to erupt and kill millions of gutless swine.
But nope: beam weapon from space.
Figures.