WATCH: My exclusive interview with Bishop Strickland, where I ask him all the questions on everyone’s heart in the midst of his unjust cancellation.
Pray for this good Bishop. #IstandwithBishopStrickland pic.twitter.com/G1TaPO0c4P
— John-Henry Westen (@JhWesten) November 12, 2023
Previously: Pope Francis to Allow Trannies to Get Baptized, Become Godparents
We’ve said we’re not going to comment on the revolutionary transformation happening in the Catholic Church. It was one thing when we were just talking about the crazy things that the Pope was saying, but now that he’s begun so aggressively moving to transform the Church through these extreme official actions, the issue has become very sensitive.
For people who aren’t following this closely: since taking office, Pope Francis has always made strange and often extremely offensive statements that appear to contradict basic Church teachings. Only recently, however, has he begun taking official actions to implement the revolutionary agenda he’s been professing for a decade.
In October, the Vatican released a document following the Pope’s anal and vaginal “alternative synod,” which featured non-Catholics and even non-Christians explaining why the Church needs a lot of gay sex (including fisting) and vagina priests. The document (PDF) doesn’t call for any of these things immediately, but says that they are open for further discussion.
Following that, the Pope released an official statement saying that trannies and other homosexuals can be baptized without repentance. Allowing baptism without repentance for any sin, let alone the sin of sodomy, is obviously in opposition to all Church teachings and against the basic New Testament. The document further said that the homosexual “adopted” (kidnapped) kids of homosexuals could be baptized, noting explicitly that this applies to children produced by the sickening act of surrogacy. The document effectively explains that there is no difference between active homosexuals openly and publicly engaged in anal acts, and normal faithful Catholics.
As a quick follow-up to these documents, we now have the firing of one of the most conservative Bishops in the Church.
Pope Francis dismissed prominent conservative critic Bishop John Strickland, of Tyler, Texas, on Saturday, following an investigation earlier this year into the firebrand’s diocese.
The Vatican did not explain the reasoning for Strickland’s firing.
There is no explanation on the Vatican website. They issued a press release saying they fired him because he refused to resign.
Bishop John Strickland
He was clearly fired because he was criticizing the anal agenda of the Pope, and it is further clear that this is intended to send a message to all bishops: “don’t get in the way of my gay asshole.”
Appointed to the diocese in 2012 by the late Pope Benedict, Strickland emerged as one of the harshest critics of Pope Francis, claiming on X earlier this year that he rejected the Church leader’s “program undermining the Deposit of Faith.”
Strickland is vocally opposed to Pope Francis’ efforts to help the LGBTQ community feel more welcome in the Catholic Church, as well as efforts to give everyday individuals more responsibility.
Ahead of the October synod, he wrote in an August letter that an “evil and false message” had “invaded” the church.
Look: homosexuals were always “welcome” in the Church. Everyone is welcome in the Church. That’s why it’s call “Church.”
Furthermore, homosexuals were always able to repent of their sins and join the Church. Strickland nor anyone else would disagree with that. What the Pope is doing is making active homosexual behavior a norm in the Church.
The firing of Strickland further proves that the Pope has the ability to fire people, something that was apparently not obvious before.
It was understood that he had that ability, yet he was not exercising it.
Now that he has fired Bishop Strickland, we must consider the fact that he has not fired Bishop Weisemann, the German Bishop who has gone full anal (and, in fact, double-anal).
So let me get this right…
Bishop Weisemann is in good standing with Rome, but Bishop Strickland is removed?
Have I got this now? Is there something I am missing?This has to be one of the most scandalous events of our time and an outrage. pic.twitter.com/Y6KosZEVgv
— Fr DB Sweet (@FrBradSweet) November 11, 2023
Now, there is no denying that the Pope is an active supporter and endorser of gay anal “marriage” (it’s not marriage, and two men cannot have “sex” either – men can play pretend, they can masturbate into each other’s poop-holes).
The Pope is clearly totally out of control and hellbent on turning the entire Church into a gay orgy.
However, we are reserving our comment on this matter until Anglin gets a chance to talk to E. Michael Jones, who is the leader of the traditionalist Catholic movement.
Editor’s Note:
Again, this is all extremely sensitive. Above, the situation is simply being described. It’s possible that some Catholic could take issue with the description, but that person would be in denial. The firing of Strickland ups the ante, and puts the entire agenda of the Pope into clear perspective.
However, though I have a lot to say about what this means, I’m not saying it now. I have seen how sensitive this is. Again, calling the Pope a faggot or whatever didn’t mean much when he was just making these outrageous statements in public. Catholics were just saying “okay, well, he’s going to be gone soon, his opinion isn’t really relevant to anything.” Now, of course, the situation is much different, as we see the direct attack and moves to totally restructure the Church and Church teaching.
That all just is what it is.
I just got off the phone with Bishop Strickland.
Pope Francis has removed him from the diocese of Tyler. This is a very sad moment for the Catholic Church in Texas and throughout the world.
Pray for Bishop Strickland and pray for those who removed him. 🙏🏻 pic.twitter.com/KtqazTnGxl
— Dr Taylor Marshall™️ (@TaylorRMarshall) November 11, 2023
Clearly, there are implications here. Presumably, we are looking at some kind of schism. Strickland refused to resign, which is effectively a denial of the authority of the Pope, and that is entering directly into “schism” territory already.
However, in terms of what I am supposed to say about this – I need to be be sensitive about this.
I will say: I do not think the Church should be abandoned or destroyed or anything like that.
But this is shots fired. I don’t think there is any other way to view the Strickland firing.
Shots fired.